Navegando por Autor "Camicia, Rafaela G. da M."

Agora exibindo 1 - 2 de 2

Coffee dryer with dehydrated air: a technical and economic viability analysis
(Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola, 2022-08-22) Konopatzki, Evandro A.; Christ, Divair; Coelho, Silvia R. M.; Demito, Angélica; Ivan, Werncke; Camicia, Rafaela G. da M.
The defects that drying in concrete yards impose on coffee beans and the search for gourmet coffee production have prompted the emergence of new drying technologies. This work verified the technical and economic feasibility of drying coffee with dehumidified air with a refrigerating capacity of 422,908.7 J s-1, compatible with static capacity dryers equal to 75 m3. Considering the sale price of coffee, the cost of electric energy acquisition, the monthly interest rate and maintenance time, expenses that are equivalent to the depreciation of the concrete yard, a central compound rotational design was considered with 28 tests for the feasibility analysis, including the internal rate of return, net present value and the return on investment. The results showed that in the electric drying units, the dried coffee presents fewer broken and defective beans and has higher retention in a No. 17 sieve. With a higher beverage quality and a price 12.11% higher, drying with dehydrated air showed a PBD of 2.27 years and a return of US$ 2.49 million. The optimisation results were 98.98% desirable. It was concluded that it is economically feasible to dry coffee with dehydrated air and without using a concrete yard.
Price and quality of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) dried using air dehumidified by convection
(Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola, 2019) Konopatzki, Evandro A.; Christ, Divair; Coelho, Silvia R. M.; Demito, Angélica; Werncke, Ivan; Camicia, Rafaela G. da M.
Grain drying processes have been improved to reduce costs and losses of coffee beverage quality. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the quality of coffee dried using air partially dehumidified before entering drying units (DUs) in four coffee-producing farms, as well as the effects of such process on coffee commercial value. The method consisted of obtaining three samples (triplicates) of coffee dried in both DUs and concrete terraces (control) for mean multiple comparisons. The following variables were analyzed for sieve #13 and hand-picked beans: defect number, cupping test, and pricing. Evaluations were carried out by three professional graders. The results showed that coffee dried in the DUs presented fewer broken grains, higher cupping score, and less negative factors of handsorting and defects. As a conclusion, it should be emphasized an average increase of 12.11% in price for coffee beans previously dehumidified.