Épocas de irrigaçăo e parcelamento de adubaçăo sobre a produtividade do cafeeiro, em quatro safras
Data
2005-07
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título de Volume
Editor
Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola - UFCG
Resumo
Desenvolveu-se o presente trabalho, objetivando-se avaliar o efeito de diferentes épocas de irrigaçăo e de parcelamentos de adubaçăo na produtividade do cafeeiro em quatro safras consecutivas. Realizou-se um experimento em faixas, em que, nas parcelas foram avaliados diferentes parcelamentos de adubaçăo: parcela 1 recebeu 12 aplicaçőes de fertilizantes, de forma manual; parcelas 2, 3 e 4 receberam, respectivamente, 12, 24 e 36 aplicaçőes de fertilizantes via água de irrigaçăo. Nas faixas (subparcelas) foram avaliadas tręs épocas de irrigaçăo, de 1/6 a 30/9 (subparcela A), de 15/7 a 30/9 (subparcela B), de 1/9 a 30/9 (subparcela C) e um tratamento testemunha sem irrigaçăo (subparcela D), com 3 repetiçőes, em blocos. Os resultados de produtividade total de café foram submetidos à análise de variância, e, quando pertinente, ao teste de comparaçăo de médias, detectando-se efeito significativo do fator época de irrigaçăo e safras, e, a única interaçăo significativa foi entre safras e épocas de irrigaçăo, indicando que a irrigaçăo năo elimina o comportamento bienal de produtividade do cafeeiro. As melhores médias de produtividade (3852,2 e 3527,1 kg ha-1 ) resultaram das irrigaçőes de 1/6 a 30/9 e de 15/7 a 30/9, respectivamente.
The present work aimed to evaluate the effect of different periods of irrigation during and different fertilizer applications on productivity of coffee plant in 4 consecutive harvests. An experiment was accomplished in strips, in which the split fertilizer applications were tested: plot 1 received 12 applications of fertilizers in a manual way, plots 2, 3 and 4 received, respectively, 12, 24 and 36 applications of fertilizers through irrigation water. In the strips 3 irrigation periods were tested, 1/6 to 30/9, 15/7 to 30/9, 1/9 to 30/9 and a control treatment without irrigation, with 3 repetitions (blocks). The results of total coffee productivity expressed in kg ha-1 , were submitted to the variance analysis and to mean comparison test, when it was necessary. The variance analysis detected significant effect for irrigation times and in harvests. The only significant interaction was between harvest and irrigation times, showing that the irrigation does not eliminate the biennial cycle of coffee plant productivity. The irrigation from 1/6 to 30/9, and from 15/7 to 30/9 provided better mean productivity of 3,852.2 and 3,527.1 kg ha-1 , respectively.
The present work aimed to evaluate the effect of different periods of irrigation during and different fertilizer applications on productivity of coffee plant in 4 consecutive harvests. An experiment was accomplished in strips, in which the split fertilizer applications were tested: plot 1 received 12 applications of fertilizers in a manual way, plots 2, 3 and 4 received, respectively, 12, 24 and 36 applications of fertilizers through irrigation water. In the strips 3 irrigation periods were tested, 1/6 to 30/9, 15/7 to 30/9, 1/9 to 30/9 and a control treatment without irrigation, with 3 repetitions (blocks). The results of total coffee productivity expressed in kg ha-1 , were submitted to the variance analysis and to mean comparison test, when it was necessary. The variance analysis detected significant effect for irrigation times and in harvests. The only significant interaction was between harvest and irrigation times, showing that the irrigation does not eliminate the biennial cycle of coffee plant productivity. The irrigation from 1/6 to 30/9, and from 15/7 to 30/9 provided better mean productivity of 3,852.2 and 3,527.1 kg ha-1 , respectively.
Descrição
Palavras-chave
Manejo de irrigaçăo, Fertirrigaçăo, Ciclo bienal
Citação
SILVA, A. M.; COELHO, G.; SILVA, R. A. Épocas de irrigaçăo e parcelamento de adubaçăo sobre a produtividade do cafeeiro, em quatro safras. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental, Campina Grande, v. 9, n. 3, p. 314-319, 2005.